Photo not Authentic - taken outside of Jamaica
Yesterday, the Jamaica Star published a story about a photo that the police had in their possession. For fear of a lawsuit, I will not publish the photo here or provide a link to the article. In it, a few persons appear. However of interest are two persons; one with the likeness to a DJ called Vibz Kartel and the other with the likeness to one called Aidonia.
The police have said they which to question the men, as they would like to know some more about the photo. Simple enough,the picture could be authentic, a genuine true snapshot of time or not authentic, as in this age of computer graphics it is pretty straightforward in the hands of a intermediate graphic designer for images to be doctored. So this is an interesting piece of news and it is only reasonable that we find out more.
Today, we hear of threats to sue the Star for the publication of the photo. The lawyer representing the artistes, whose likeness appear in the photo, utters a very interesting statement. Here I quote a report from the Radio Jamaica web site but I heard the statement myself in a news clip.(
"According to Mrs. Neita-Robertson, the photos were not taken in Jamaica and do not appear to be authentic. "
Can someone please explain this. The photos, which suggest that there was or is more than one photo. Secondly the photos were taken outside of Jamaica since they were not taken inside of Jamaica.
The big question then is how can images that were captured by a camera, at a location outside of Jamaica, that at a point were authentic, having not been tampered with, become not authentic?
RJR report
http://www.radiojamaica.com/content/view/5332/26/
The police have said they which to question the men, as they would like to know some more about the photo. Simple enough,the picture could be authentic, a genuine true snapshot of time or not authentic, as in this age of computer graphics it is pretty straightforward in the hands of a intermediate graphic designer for images to be doctored. So this is an interesting piece of news and it is only reasonable that we find out more.
Today, we hear of threats to sue the Star for the publication of the photo. The lawyer representing the artistes, whose likeness appear in the photo, utters a very interesting statement. Here I quote a report from the Radio Jamaica web site but I heard the statement myself in a news clip.(
"According to Mrs. Neita-Robertson, the photos were not taken in Jamaica and do not appear to be authentic. "
Can someone please explain this. The photos, which suggest that there was or is more than one photo. Secondly the photos were taken outside of Jamaica since they were not taken inside of Jamaica.
The big question then is how can images that were captured by a camera, at a location outside of Jamaica, that at a point were authentic, having not been tampered with, become not authentic?
RJR report
http://www.radiojamaica.com/content/view/5332/26/
Comments